Re: [epp-dev] update of package status - please respin?

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I vote +1 for a Java EE build from 20090621-0840 (It fixed the issue with 
property files, so words are displayed for 'capability' item, instead of 
NL %keys). Thanks Markus, for working over the weekend to recreate to make 
up for my errors ... twice!

I've "diffed" the 20090621-0840 version and the 20090619-0630 version with 
no unexpected differences (for windows, one of the linux ones, and one of 
the mac ones) so I think we're safe. 

Thanks, 




From:
David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To:
Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
06/19/2009 12:24 PM
Subject:
Re: [epp-dev] update of package status - please respin?
Sent by:
epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



I'm open to be persuaded otherwise, but I would like to request a respin 
to pick up the last fixes in 
bug 280566 add capabilities (and preferences) 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=280566

Apologizes for "rushing in" this fix for capabilities in the last week 
(which has led to 3 or 4 errors on my part) ... but pretty sure this is 
the last error to fix. 

It does not literally break any function nor damage anyone's data, which 
is why I say I "could be persuaded otherwise". 
But, should be safe and not invalidate other's testing and greatly improve 

the perceived quality. 
If there's any issues or problems just producing the build, for some 
reason, we could drop back to 20090619-0630.

Thanks, 





From:
Markus Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
EPP Developer Mailing List <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
06/19/2009 07:06 AM
Subject:
[epp-dev] update of package status - please test
Sent by:
epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



Hi package maintainers,

I think we have a build now that is a hot candidate for being released 
next week.

Please test and send your +1/-1 to this mailing list:

  URL: http://www.eclipse.org/epp/download.php
  Build ID: 20090619-0630

I really would like to avoid any rebuilds of the packages from now on. 
Possible reasons for a rebuild include a major change in the upstream 
Galileo repository or a stop-ship bug in one of the packages. A simple 
typo does not qualify for a rebuild :-)

Many thanks and regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev



_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev