+ 1 for reporting package (windows, linux), buildid: 20090323-1714
Thanks,
Xiaoying
From:
epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Markus Knauer
Sent: 2009年3月24日 3:00
To: Eclipse Packaging Project
Subject: [epp-dev] UPDATE: Galileo package testing
Hi *,
in the meantime my new build finished successfully for all platforms, so I
think we should test the newest one. Look here: http://www.eclipse.org/epp/download.php
build 20090323-1714.
[If you already tested the last version... just tell me which one you tested.]
I am downloading the packages right now and will do some testing on them, but
this can take ages because every package needs about 20 minutes to download
over the wireless network here.
Regards, Markus
2009/3/23 Eric Rizzo <erizzo-eclipse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 3/23/2009 1:51 PM, Markus Knauer wrote:
I had a discussion here about the mac packages. The outcome
of this
discussion is: Most people do *not* want carbon.ppc any more and would
prefer macosx.cocoa.x86 for a package download.
What I did...
[1] I started a new build that builds macosx.cocoa.x86 instead of the
old macosx.carbon.ppc packages.
[2] I included a workaround for the missing linux-x86_64 CPP package
So, what's your thinking about this change in the mac packages? Dropping
the old one and using the macosx.cocoa.x86 packages only?
I think that is a fine choice. It has been a couple of years
(I think) since Apple started focusing on Intel instead of PPC; frthermore, I'm
pretty sure the SWT team is anxious to get the Cocoa implementation in front of
people ASAP (it's been one of the most-requested features from users for a long
time).
Eric
--
Markus Knauer
EclipseSource
### phone: +49 721 664 733 0 (GMT +1)
### fax: +49 721 664 733 29
### web: www.eclipsesource.com
Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
Stephanienstrasse 20, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany
General Manager: Jochen Krause
Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883
