Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [epp-dev] Re: EPP P2 Wizard

Strangely, it seems that the workflow for provisioning and moves does not involve bugzilla reports being created (either that or I am missing somethign).  We have come across this in the various moves we are doing now for RT.  It would be great if teams could track the progress of the move by watching a bug that is related to the request.

I entered the following enhancement request
    https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=242415

Jeff

Wayne Beaton wrote:
Thanks Jordi and Jeff.

I had mistakenly assumed that the code was from the existing yoxos.com
code, based on some earlier conversations. I agree that a CQ is not
required (though the rules are actually a little grey in this case).

Jordi, I took a quick look through the code and noticed that many of the
classes are missing copyright notices. You should probably add them at
your earliest convenience.

Was a bugzilla entry created for the new component?

Wayne

On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 10:34 -0400, Jeff McAffer wrote:
  
Thanks for providing the background Jordi.  Related to the CQ part, 
since this was all done by EPP committers as part of the wizard 
component it would not appear to need a CQ (IMHO).  It is simply the 
first commit of some new function.  Just to clarify the provisioning 
request, the message included below is a result of following the process 
and filling out the provisioning request form.  I agree that the 
workflow there needs to be improved but it is what it is now.

Jeff

Jordi Böhme López wrote:
    
Hi Wayne,

It seems that it is really hard to keep track of everything that is 
going on
at Eclipse, even for our Eclipse Evangelist ;-)

You found the component announcement (this is not only a notification 
to the
EMO, but to all committers and members).

The NPPR is - to my knowledge - none public, but it happened on June 5 
2008,
here is an excerpt:

Subject: New Project Validation Phase Provisioning Request Form
(technology.packaging)
Date: Thursday 05 June 2008
From: "Eclipse WebMaster (Automated)"

...

_____ Committers _____
1. This is the list of committers. They will be provisioned with
  UNIX accounts after they have filled out the online and paper
  forms and agreements.
2. [webmaster] Use this list to create the unix groups.
3. [EMO legal] Use this list to mark project leads.

   Name: Jeff McAffer
   Email: jeff@xxxxxxxxx
   Packages:

   Name: Jordi B�hme L�pez
   Email: jboehme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Packages:

   Name: Henrik Lindberg
   Email: henrik.lindberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Packages:

_____ Initial CVS/SVN Components _____
[Repository Type: CVS]
* using existing CVS repository: /cvsroot/technology/org.eclipse.epp
* new committers need write access (probably unix group epp-dev?)

<<<<<<<<

The code has been developed by the committers of the project (namely me)
during the last two weeks, thus we did not see any reason to submit a CQ.
All prototyping that we did before the component was started was 
dumped. If
you still see the need for a CQ please let me know.

Saludos,
Jordi
      
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
    
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
  

Back to the top