Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [epp-dev] FW: EPP content wizard

I like the suggested presentation of the wizard.  We do not want to supplant the packages but rather allow the users to augment them. 

 

As for where the code should go, I humbly suggest that it be part of EPP and even more humbly suggest that Jordi and I be voted in as EPP committers with a mission of developing and maintaining the code.  What we have now is a prototype and has been developed explicitly for this context over the past week.  I don’t see any particular IP hurdle.  Either we commit it as committers or we contribute it and run it through the mill.  The code is quite small.

 

Jeff

 

From: epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Skerrett
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 2:39 PM
To: 'Eclipse Packaging Project'
Subject: RE: [epp-dev] FW: EPP content wizard

 

I think it is a great idea and it would be great to see for Ganymede.  Of course the risk is that it doesn’t work but I think we can mitigate the risk by 1) having awesome developers work on it, and 2) making sure it is optional, so we can bring it down if it doesn’t work.

 

What I would suggest is that on the new package site we add a ‘customize’ button.  This would allow each package to be customized; the starting point can be the package contents but then the user can add or delete the contents using the wizard.  The one thing I would like to see part of all installs is the UDC component.

 

Btw, where would this code reside?  Do we need to put this through the IP process?

 

Ian

 

 


From: epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff McAffer
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:44 PM
To: epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [epp-dev] FW: EPP content wizard

 

Sigh, this is a resend as the original did not seem to get through… 

 

Jeff

 

From: Jeff McAffer [mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1:01 PM
To: 'epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: EPP content wizard

 

I was in Germany last week for JAX and Eclipse Forum Europe.  While there a group of people got talking about Eclipse, Ganymede, EPP, p2, etc and end user experiences in getting Eclipse.  One of the ideas that surfaced was creating a RAP-based wizard that would allow people to select a package and then refine the contents of the package.  After completing the wizard users would get a p2-based installer that would install the profile they just described. 

 

This seemed like a really cool direction so Jordi Lopez and I spent a bit of time talking about if this could work, how it would work etc.  It seemed feasible so we started to scratch together some code to actually do it.  That has progressed but is not demo-able yet. 

 

We had a brief discussion with Markus and he rightly suggested that we surface the idea to the EPP community before it goes much further.  So, we can get into more technical detail etc but first,

 

1)      Is this something in which the EPP community is interested?

2)      If so, where/how should the work be done?  I am volunteering Code 9 to do the p2 side of things and Jordi/Innoopract is game for the RAP side.

 

The value in doing this are multi-fold:

-          Users should get a better experience when they need more than just one of the canned packages

-          Projects that are not part of one of the packages get more exposure by being offered as part of the wizard

-          This is a great demo for Eclipse technology such as RAP, Equinox on the server, p2, …

 

I understand that flavors of this topic have been discussed here before and apologize if this is a rehashing and to be absolutely clear, EPP should still offer the download zips.  The wizard idea would just augment the story.  If it turns out not to work, we do not need to make it visible.

 

In any event, the idea of a wizard for selecting content is, IMHO, particularly compelling and I think we have a real shot at making it happen.  What do you think?

 

Jeff


Back to the top