Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [epf-dev] Re: [technology-pmc] EPF 1.2 Release Review


Bjorn, thanks for your reply. I'll add to the slides the two items you mentioned below.

Regarding the external epfwiki.net, we understand that there are legal implications in harvesting the content that has been contributed in there. I started discussing with Janet that very topic when I met her at the EclipseCon this year, but I haven't heard yet an official position on how to proceed with this. She mentioned the board would need to discuss that issue. Do you have any inside information?

We are making sure that we don't add any content to the project without IP legal review. So far the wiki has been used for reviews of content and comments. Another major work that the wiki facilitates is the translation of content, which is moving forward pretty fast. The time is coming when we will need to harvest this translated content and make it officially available, so Janet's team advice on how to proceed will be appreciated.

Thanks again,

Ricardo Balduino
IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf)



Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/06/2007 09:37 AM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
[epf-dev] Re: [technology-pmc] EPF 1.2 Release Review





Ricardo,
Looks good, so go ahead and schedule a review. I have two minor comments: (1) you need page numbers; (2) you need a copyright statement in addition to the EPL statement.  I have one major concern that you will need to address: I am concerned that content from the external epfwiki.net has leaked into the Eclipse EPF project without proper IP legal review. This sort of "creep" is why we prefer using eclipse.org hosted infrastructure rather than externally hosted infrastructure. So when you request your IP approval for release from Janet's team, she'll need to understand whether any external content was used in the creation of EPF and if so, what IP controls/checks were applied.  Thanks.

But, hey, enough grumping - this is very cool!

- Bjorn

Ricardo Balduino wrote:


Technology PMC,


We are approaching the release 1.2 of EPF project (end of July/07) and we would like to schedule a Release Review meeting.

Attached you find the slide deck with the information to be presented.


Please, let us know the arrangements for the meeting.

Regards,


Ricardo Balduino
IBM Rational Software (
www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (
www.eclipse.org/epf)

_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev


Back to the top