Re: [epf-dev] epfwiki

[Ricardo Balduino <balduino@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Diego,

We don't have a specific date that Eclipse
legal has committed to give us the approval. Unfortunately, that's not
in our control :-)
Onno said we are dealing with issues
they raise as they analyze the code, so I hope we are moving forward helping
them in their analysis.

Another related topic we expect legal
to give a position soon is about how to 'legally' harvest content written
in the Wiki (e.g. translation) back into the project (namely, into CVS).

Regards,

Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer

IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf)

"Pamio, Diego" <diego.pamio@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/23/2007 06:51 PM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[epf-dev] epfwiki

Any news on the legal aspects
of the epfwiki addition to epf-composer publishing mechanism? To which
date the Eclipse Legal guys have committed to give a verdict on the topic?
I mean, baselining process, comparing versions and having rss feeds could
automatically deploy several CMMi best practices on OPD/OPF that our Organization
and many others will surely appreciate. If not possible to get the donated
code, then I will suggest adding these features to the current epf-composer
in the hard way (coding ;-))
 
Regards and thank you in advance,
Diego N. Pamio
asdc
Argentina Software
Development Center
Intel Software de Arg.
++54 351 414 5571
 _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev