| RE: [epf-dev] epfwiki |
|
I have some: Ricardo and I answered some (three)
questions from Eclipse Legal about the donation last week. I’m not sure
why it is still not through, so far we haven’t encountered major obstacles.
If we stay on top of it and respond
immediately to clarify things to Eclipse Legal we can finish it soon, I think. Ricardo
kindly offered to help with this and I also have more time available for the EPF
project from now on, so that will help. I have to point out though that will be just
the first step: development work is also required to prepare a release from it.
Charlie and Peter put in the roadmap for third quarter of 2007 if I remember
correctly. Best Regards, Onno From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pamio, Diego Any news on the legal
aspects of the epfwiki addition to epf-composer publishing mechanism? To which
date the Eclipse Legal guys have committed to give a verdict on the topic? I
mean, baselining process, comparing versions and having rss feeds could
automatically deploy several CMMi best practices on OPD/OPF that our
Organization and many others will surely appreciate. If not possible to get the
donated code, then I will suggest adding these features to the current
epf-composer in the hard way (coding ;-)) Regards and thank you in
advance, Diego N. Pamio asdc Argentina Software Intel Software de Arg. ++54 351 414 5571 This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. |