RE: [epf-dev] Resolving open/deferred PM bugs

["Chris Armstrong" <chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Seems reasonable to me. I agree that we want to keep it lean and mean... Chris ~:|

---

From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Per Kroll
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:43 AM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [epf-dev] Resolving open/deferred PM bugs

Hi, 

we have 6 deferred PM bugs. Below you find my 
recommendations for each bug. In general, I think we need to keep the process 
small. Only add stuff if it is really crucial. Please  comment. 
Any takers on writing content?

146439

2006-10-19

maj

P2

PC

RESO

EPF

Content

0.9

1.0.0

PM - Add new Concept: Project Team

Suggest 
closing, never doing. I do not think this is critical.

146457	2006-10-19	maj	P2	PC	RESO	EPF	Content	0.9	1.0.0	PM - Guideline: Prioritizing Work - add content Suggest closing, never doing. I do not think this is critical.
146461	2006-10-19	maj	P2	PC	RESO	EPF	Content	0.9	1.0.0	PM - Guideline: Staffing Project - add content Keep - Suggest leveraging some content Scott has on generalizing specialist.
146466	2006-10-19	maj	P2	PC	RESO	EPF	Content	0.9	1.0.0	PM - Guideline: Type and Frequency of Assessments - add c...  - Suggest closing, never doing. I do not think this is critical.
146467	2006-10-19	maj	P2	PC	RESO	EPF	Content	0.9	1.0.0	PM - Guideline: Types of Metrics - add content Suggest closing, never doing. I do not think this is critical.
146476	2006-10-19	maj	P2	PC	RESO	EPF	Content	0.9	1.0.0	PM - Concept: Building Effective Teams - add content Suggest closing, never doing. I do not think this is critical.

Cheers 

Per 
Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process 
Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 
408-219-2963