Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [epf-dev] Conference Call for OpenUP/Basic package owners tomorrow

I will unfortunately not be able to join due to a conflict, but here's the stuff for PM...
 
Work Items Left: 32 - Major: 26, Normal: 3, Enhance: 3
New Items Created Last Week: 30
Items Fixed Last Week: 0
Items for Next Week: 137120, 146446, 146445, 146503
Unassigned Items: 31 - need to send out a call to action and get some people to volunteer
Issues Preventing Progress: Laws of Physics and the Integrity of the Time-Space Continuum
 
Something I'm sure others have considered, is that it would seem that we should be able to get most of this info right out of Bugzilla automatically with reports. Is someone interested in seeing how well this might work?
 
Also, who is responsible for items that aren't attributable to specific packages/disciplines (such as general items like 146449, 146450, & 146451 to name a few)?
 
I've also attached a Process Component Completeness Guideline that we've used to help describe how done certain things need to be at throughout the lifecycle of a process component. This isn't exactly aligned with the UMA metamodel, but hopefully it's close enough to get the idea. I'd be interested to know if people thought that this might be useful in help guiding us through R1.0.
 
Let me know how it goes!
 
Chris ~:|
 
 


From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Per Kroll
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:30 PM
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Cc: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List; epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Conference Call for OpenUP/Basic package owners tomorrow


Hi,

I suggest that each Package / Disicpline owner reports on
a) How many work items are left?
b) How many new work items were created last week?
c) Which work items were fixed last week?
d) Which work items do you plan to fix next week?
e) How many unassigned work items
f) Issues preventing progress?

Call-in:
Toll-free dial-in: 1-877-421-0003
Toll dial-in:      1-770-615-1374
<For IBMers> Tie-line dial-in:  421-0003
Participant passcode: 667201

Thanks

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815



"Brian Lyons" <blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/13/2006 02:37 PM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[epf-dev] Conference Call for OpenUP/Basic package owners tomorrow





hiho,
 
Sorry for the last-minute notice.  I would like to have a conference call at 8am pacific time tomorrow (6/14/2006) for the OpenUP/Basic package owners to touch base as a status update on open items to be done as part of our 1.0 release.
 
This is not meant to be a problem-solving call or anything.  It will just be a chance for each package owner to note how many process elements were done in the last week, how many are left to be done overall, how many are expected to be done in the next week, plus identify any problems.
 
The idea is to have the call tomorrow, then on Tuesday the 20th next week (to align well with the European Face to Face meeting), then get in the habit of having them on each Wednesday until release 1.0.  If a package-owner can’t make it onto the call, he should get the “how many elements left to do” data sent out to epf-dev before the meeting so we have a complete view across the OpenUP/Basic content.  There has been some verbal discussion of this amongst various key parties but based on the late notice, we’ll consider this a dry run just to get the ball rolling.  It is certainly understandable if someone doesn’t make it on this first call.
 
For the sake of transparency anyone can call in to observe, but it is expected that just the committers responsible for the packages will participate.  Though this first call might be a bit sloppy, we are hoping to get these down to no more than 30 minutes of status.  The resulting data will be sent out to the epf-dev list after the meeting.
 
Per Kroll is going to send out a subsequent message with the conference call number.  He might also have a tweak to what data I have suggested be relayed in the call.
 
                                                                  ------------- b_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

Attachment: APG_ProcessComponentCompleteness_Guideline_v1_0.doc
Description: MS-Word document


Back to the top