Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[epf-dev] RE: epf-dev Digest, Vol 2, Issue 8

Per, BearingPoint is in also.

-----Original Message-----
From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of epf-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:01 PM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: epf-dev Digest, Vol 2, Issue 8

Send epf-dev mailing list submissions to
	epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	epf-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
	epf-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of epf-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Vote on new Committers (Per Kroll)
   2. Re: Vote on new Committers (Kelvin Low)
   3. Re: Vote on new Committers (James E Thario)
   4. Re: Vote on new Committers (Peter Haumer)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:19:47 -0800
From: Per Kroll <pkroll@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [epf-dev] Vote on new Committers
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:

<OFF76718E9.777307E2-ON88257117.005BFA3A-88257117.0069F2E9@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

we need to vote on new committers. We need 3 yes, and no veto to accept
a
new committer.
I am voting yes through this e-mail.

If there are other people that expect to become committers, but are not
on
the list below, please send me a note asap and we will do one more vote.
I
do not want to vote on people that are still iffy on whether they will
be
committers or not, and I know many organizations are still finalizing
who
should be a committer.

The following people have voting rights (and no others need to reply):
- Peter Haumer
- Ricardo Balduino
- Jim Thario
- Per Kroll
- Charlie Yan
- Kelvin Low
- Jao Tham
We need +3 of you to respond with Yes. You can also Obstain or Veto. If
you veto, you need to provide a reason for your veto within 24 hours, or

your veto is ignored.

- Brian Lyons, NumberSix
- Steve Adolph, University of British Columbia
- Kirti Vaidya, Covansys
- Asier Azieta, European Software Institute
- Sigurd Hopen, 2-Pro Mentor

Again, if you expected your name here, and it is not, it is because I am

still uncertain of whether you are firm as a committer. Please send me a

note confirming that you should be a committer.

Thanks

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://eclipse.org/pipermail/epf-dev/attachments/20060216/23be6f88/attac
hment.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:41:44 -0800
From: Kelvin Low <lowk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Vote on new Committers
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
	<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:

<OF4B33F332.35DDC40D-ON87257117.00771AB0-88257117.0076F251@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I vote "yes".

Regards,
Kelvin

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelvin Low
Software Architect
IBM Method and IC Engineering
tel:  408-342-4630
fax: 408-863-4144
email: lowk@xxxxxxxxxx


epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/16/2006 11:19:47 AM:

>
> Hi,
>
> we need to vote on new committers. We need 3 yes, and no veto to
> accept a new committer.
> I am voting yes through this e-mail.
>
> If there are other people that expect to become committers, but are
> not on the list below, please send me a note asap and we will do one
> more vote. I do not want to vote on people that are still iffy on
> whether they will be committers or not, and I know many
> organizations are still finalizing who should be a committer.
>
> The following people have voting rights (and no others need to reply):

> - Peter Haumer
> - Ricardo Balduino
> - Jim Thario
> - Per Kroll
> - Charlie Yan
> - Kelvin Low
> - Jao Tham
> We need +3 of you to respond with Yes. You can also Obstain or Veto.
> If you veto, you need to provide a reason for your veto within 24
> hours, or your veto is ignored.
>
> - Brian Lyons, NumberSix
> - Steve Adolph, University of British Columbia
> - Kirti Vaidya, Covansys
> - Asier Azieta, European Software Institute
> - Sigurd Hopen, 2-Pro Mentor
>
> Again, if you expected your name here, and it is not, it is because
> I am still uncertain of whether you are firm as a committer. Please
> send me a note confirming that you should be a committer.
>
> Thanks
>
> Per Kroll
> STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
> Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
> Rational Software, IBM Corp
> 408-342-3815_______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://eclipse.org/pipermail/epf-dev/attachments/20060216/dc23c6ac/attac
hment.html

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:51:46 -0700
From: James E Thario <jethario@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Vote on new Committers
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
	<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:

<OF27965E87.48FD255B-ON87257117.00778A42-87257117.00781895@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part
--------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://eclipse.org/pipermail/epf-dev/attachments/20060216/2adc59e5/grayc
ol.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic11896.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1255 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://eclipse.org/pipermail/epf-dev/attachments/20060216/2adc59e5/pic11
896.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ecblank.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://eclipse.org/pipermail/epf-dev/attachments/20060216/2adc59e5/ecbla
nk.gif

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:02:48 -0500
From: Peter Haumer <phaumer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Vote on new Committers
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
	<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:

<OF79B85B09.D452EFF8-ON85257117.0078EEAB-85257117.0078F8B7@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

YES


Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.

______________________________________________________________

Rational Software | IBM Software Group
PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
RUP Development, Cupertino, CA
Tel/Fax: +1 408 863-8716
______________________________________________________________



Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/16/2006 14:19
Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


To
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
[epf-dev] Vote on new Committers







Hi,

we need to vote on new committers. We need 3 yes, and no veto to accept
a
new committer.
I am voting yes through this e-mail.

If there are other people that expect to become committers, but are not
on
the list below, please send me a note asap and we will do one more vote.
I
do not want to vote on people that are still iffy on whether they will
be
committers or not, and I know many organizations are still finalizing
who
should be a committer.

The following people have voting rights (and no others need to reply):
- Peter Haumer
- Ricardo Balduino
- Jim Thario
- Per Kroll
- Charlie Yan
- Kelvin Low
- Jao Tham
We need +3 of you to respond with Yes. You can also Obstain or Veto. If
you veto, you need to provide a reason for your veto within 24 hours, or

your veto is ignored.

- Brian Lyons, NumberSix
- Steve Adolph, University of British Columbia
- Kirti Vaidya, Covansys
- Asier Azieta, European Software Institute
- Sigurd Hopen, 2-Pro Mentor

Again, if you expected your name here, and it is not, it is because I am

still uncertain of whether you are firm as a committer. Please send me a

note confirming that you should be a committer.

Thanks

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://eclipse.org/pipermail/epf-dev/attachments/20060216/ad4e41a8/attac
hment.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev


End of epf-dev Digest, Vol 2, Issue 8
*************************************


***************************************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system.
***************************************************************************************************


Back to the top