Re: [egit-dev] Synchronization View priories

[Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

2010/8/18 Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Dariusz Luksza
<dariusz.luksza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to establish some priories for synchronization view so that I
> can establish proper task queue. I want to know yours opinion what is
> more important for community and would be proffered to see in 0.9.x
> release. Here is my current task stack:
>
> * mylyn integration (bug: 322946[1])

I would push this one as this has the biggest gain for us in terms of
consumers. If you can work on getting the ActiveChangeSet support in
our changeset implementation, I can start working on the mylyn/egit
integration...
    http://github.com/caniszczyk/mylyn-git

> As you can see there are lots of things that  should to be done. I'm
> waiting for yours personal opinion what is more important.

I think once we get 0.9 out the door, we'll have a lot more people
using the synchronize view so we'll get a lot more feedback outside
the immediate development team. That will help shape our goals a bit.
We should just focus on stabilization for 0.9 as we start winding down
in the next few weeks...

Exactly, therefore I second Benjamin's opinion that we should first concentrate

on bug fixing until 0.9 is out.

I think we should also document what's already working in the synchronize view

(in the user guide) and what is not yet working (as issues in Bugzilla linked

from the user guide through a parent issue for all open synchronize view issues). 

Otherwise we'll confuse users and get a lot of bug reports for stuff we already 

know is not working. 

-- 

Matthias