Re: [eclipselink-users] id-validation and persist()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipselink-users] id-validation and persist()

From: Laird Nelson <ljnelson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:42:06 -0700
Delivered-to: eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-users>
List-help: <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:53 AM, jamesssss <jamesssss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We should probably have a mode that allows 0 for non generated id, but
doesn't for generated ones,

something like,

"eclipselink.id-validation"="GENERATOR_ONLY", ... maybe even the default,

Yes, exactly.

Please log a bug.

Will do; thanks.

Best,

Laird

http://about.me/lairdnelson

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipselink-users] id-validation and persist()
  - From: scott@xxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [eclipselink-users] id-validation and persist()
  - From: Laird Nelson
- Re: [eclipselink-users] id-validation and persist()
  - From: jamesssss

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] Table generated identifiers (JPA spec. question)
Next by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] AggregateCollectionMapping in dynamic Mapping
Previous by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] id-validation and persist()
Next by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] id-validation and persist()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs