Re: [eclipselink-users] Entity isn't persisted to database

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipselink-users] Entity isn't persisted to database

From: cinhtau <cinhtau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-to: eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-users>
List-help: <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I could locate that problem. Neither EclipseLink with persist and merge was
responsible for that behavior. It was a catched exception in the EJB, which
forces the EJB/JTA to rollback the transaction.



--
View this message in context: http://eclipse.1072660.n5.nabble.com/Entity-isn-t-persisted-to-database-tp154017p154065.html
Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

References:
- [eclipselink-users] Entity isn't persisted to database
  - From: cinhtau
- Re: [eclipselink-users] Entity isn't persisted to database
  - From: Bernard
- Re: [eclipselink-users] Entity isn't persisted to database
  - From: cinhtau

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] Column definitions and DDL
Next by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] OptimisticLockException on query, but with one user, no changes
Previous by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] Entity isn't persisted to database
Next by thread: [eclipselink-users] Column definitions and DDL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs