[eclipselink-users] Ignoring of javax.persistence.provider

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[eclipselink-users] Ignoring of javax.persistence.provider

From: Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:31:12 +0200
Accept-language: de-DE, en-US
Acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Delivered-to: eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-users>
List-help: <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcyPLFwkFqeywvadSyumNLJ42V6jqQ==
Thread-topic: Ignoring of javax.persistence.provider

Hi,

is my observation correct, that eclipselink completely ignores the javax.persistence.provider property?

Kind regards,

Arne Limburg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipselink-users] Ignoring of javax.persistence.provider
  - From: Tom Ware

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] Listenening to Session/ UnitofWork Events from jpa/j2ee
Next by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] Ignoring of javax.persistence.provider
Previous by thread: [eclipselink-users] Listenening to Session/ UnitofWork Events from jpa/j2ee
Next by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] Ignoring of javax.persistence.provider
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top