Re: [eclipselink-users] cache coordination

[Yannick Majoros <yannick.majoros@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Hi James,

Thanks. I did some test, and it seems EL needs the JMS queue to start. 
Any way to let it run even if the queue is not available, so that my 
second server can still start when my first one is unavailable?

Regards,

Yannick

Le 10/08/2011 15:25, James Sutherland a écrit :
> You could setup your system for cache coordination with a single host.  It
> will not have any affect other than adding the overhead of the JMS calls.
>
> If the JMS host fails, you will only loose the coordinated cache, until the
> host restarts.
>
>
> ymajoros wrote:
> >    Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to setup JMS cache coordination.
> >
> > We aren't in a cluster and won't be until a couple of months.
> >
> > I was wondering: could I still setup this from a single jms host? What
> > would happen if the host fails? If all we risk is losing cache
> > coordination, we could live with that. Is it the case, or could it block
> > all depending applications?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Yannick
>
> -----
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland
> http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/
>   EclipseLink ,  http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/
> TopLink
> Wiki:  http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink ,
> http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink
> Forums:  http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink ,
> http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink
> Book:  http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence
> Blog:  http://java-persistence-performance.blogspot.com/ Java Persistence
> Performance