| Re: [eclipselink-users] cache coordination |
You could setup your system for cache coordination with a single host. It will not have any affect other than adding the overhead of the JMS calls. If the JMS host fails, you will only loose the coordinated cache, until the host restarts. ymajoros wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to setup JMS cache coordination. > > We aren't in a cluster and won't be until a couple of months. > > I was wondering: could I still setup this from a single jms host? What > would happen if the host fails? If all we risk is losing cache > coordination, we could live with that. Is it the case, or could it block > all depending applications? > > Thanks > > Yannick > > ----- http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/ EclipseLink , http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/ TopLink Wiki: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink , http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink Forums: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink , http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink Book: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence Blog: http://java-persistence-performance.blogspot.com/ Java Persistence Performance -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/cache-coordination-tp32225309p32233987.html Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.