RE: [eclipselink-users] EclipseLink 1.2 Planning

[Douglas Clarke <DOUGLAS.CLARKE@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Please make sure you add yourself to the cc list of bugs your are interested in so we can discuss the enhancements within the bug and you are notified of changes made to the bug.

Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Hollosy [mailto:hollosyt@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: December 4, 2009 11:37 PM
To: EclipseLink User Discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipselink-users] EclipseLink 1.2 Planning


I voted for the Validation Support bug. I believe Hibernate already
supports this, I'd like to see EclipseLink stay ahead there.

./tch



On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Samba <saasira@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Doug/Peter,
>
>     I would want to see the bugs listed below getiing fixed in eclipselink
> 2.1.
>
> Bug 260258 - Add SessionBroker support
> Bug 280949 - Proposed Incubator: Add Data Partitioning Support
> Bug 241698 - Add Validation Support
> Further, I would also like to see a pluggable cache implementaion support in
> eclipselink 2.1, for which I could not find any bugzilla entry.
>
>    These are the features that Hibernate has but eclipselink does not have;
> of course, the feature set of eclipselink is so vast but it is always to
> good to have
>    more features, provided people need those features.
>
>    I'm interested in contributing to the Bug 280949 if you can give me a few
> pointers.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Samba
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Douglas Clarke <DOUGLAS.CLARKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> EclipseLink Users, Contributors, and Committers,
>>
>> We are wrapping up EclipseLink 2.0 now and need to start working towards
>> EclipseLink 2.1 which will be our Helios release in June. We have
>> accomplished a lot in the last year around standards delivering the
>> reference implementation of SDO 2.1.1 and now JPA 2.0 as well as addressing
>> JAXB 2.1 compliance and many advanced capabilities in all areas of the
>> project. Over the next 2 weeks we need to formalize our 2.1 themes and
>> requirements. Peter and I have started a wiki page for this purpose:
>>
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/2.1
>>
>> We are asking all interested parties to help us shape what is coming in
>> the 2.1 release as well as future releases by participating in the process.
>> Please make sure your issues and enhancement requests are captured in bugs
>> with clear descriptions and actionable outcomes. We will be basing our work
>> for this next cycle on the themes we agree upon in an upcoming committer
>> meeting as well as the bug backlog in bugzilla. Make sure if you want an
>> issue addressed that you vote for the bug and/or start a thread on the forum
>> to discuss how the project should address your requirements so that others
>> can become aware of the issue and the bug number so they can vote as well.
>>
>> As always, bugs with patches supplied will be prioritized as we greatly
>> appreciate the additional effort it takes to contribute. All feedback on
>> this process and the project in general is appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Doug Clarke & Peter Krogh
>> EclipseLink Project Leads
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipselink-users mailing list
>> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-users mailing list
> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users