Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-users] EclipseLink 1.2 Planning

I voted for the Validation Support bug. I believe Hibernate already
supports this, I'd like to see EclipseLink stay ahead there.

./tch



On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Samba <saasira@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Doug/Peter,
>
>     I would want to see the bugs listed below getiing fixed in eclipselink
> 2.1.
>
> Bug 260258 - Add SessionBroker support
> Bug 280949 - Proposed Incubator: Add Data Partitioning Support
> Bug 241698 - Add Validation Support
> Further, I would also like to see a pluggable cache implementaion support in
> eclipselink 2.1, for which I could not find any bugzilla entry.
>
>    These are the features that Hibernate has but eclipselink does not have;
> of course, the feature set of eclipselink is so vast but it is always to
> good to have
>    more features, provided people need those features.
>
>    I'm interested in contributing to the Bug 280949 if you can give me a few
> pointers.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Samba
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Douglas Clarke <DOUGLAS.CLARKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> EclipseLink Users, Contributors, and Committers,
>>
>> We are wrapping up EclipseLink 2.0 now and need to start working towards
>> EclipseLink 2.1 which will be our Helios release in June. We have
>> accomplished a lot in the last year around standards delivering the
>> reference implementation of SDO 2.1.1 and now JPA 2.0 as well as addressing
>> JAXB 2.1 compliance and many advanced capabilities in all areas of the
>> project. Over the next 2 weeks we need to formalize our 2.1 themes and
>> requirements. Peter and I have started a wiki page for this purpose:
>>
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/2.1
>>
>> We are asking all interested parties to help us shape what is coming in
>> the 2.1 release as well as future releases by participating in the process.
>> Please make sure your issues and enhancement requests are captured in bugs
>> with clear descriptions and actionable outcomes. We will be basing our work
>> for this next cycle on the themes we agree upon in an upcoming committer
>> meeting as well as the bug backlog in bugzilla. Make sure if you want an
>> issue addressed that you vote for the bug and/or start a thread on the forum
>> to discuss how the project should address your requirements so that others
>> can become aware of the issue and the bug number so they can vote as well.
>>
>> As always, bugs with patches supplied will be prioritized as we greatly
>> appreciate the additional effort it takes to contribute. All feedback on
>> this process and the project in general is appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Doug Clarke & Peter Krogh
>> EclipseLink Project Leads
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipselink-users mailing list
>> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-users mailing list
> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
>
>


Back to the top