[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipselink-dev] [External] : SDO deprecation in EclipseLink 3.0
|
Hi Lukas,
Thanks a lot for response.
> Other technologies/solutions are preferred for new apps.
What would you recommend to take a look at?
EMF for example?
Best regards,
Aleksandr Sanitckii
-----Original Message-----
From: Lukas Jungmann <lukas.jungmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:48 PM
To: Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services <eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sanitsky, Alexander <asanitsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [External] : [eclipselink-dev] SDO deprecation in EclipseLink 3.0
Hi,
On 7/17/21 6:20 AM, Sanitsky, Alexander via eclipselink-dev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Seems
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/releas
> es/3.0.php__;!!KpaPruflFCEp!zRRf9T0fiBnWYOhDoLRo-CNJSpu_eDPK7jkO74fSrs
> ADJ2V2NKLvuZOvWd1gcPQ3m5s$
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/relea
> ses/3.0.php__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!ayfq_TPXOQX-R5KSiwWZ1AWwsEqreJdvWM7LeO
> K2PcxSKcdPhV47tpurGMtCkZiNifc$> states that SDO functionality is
> deprecated starting version 3.0, but also says it's still supported.
>
> What does it mean in terms of usage?
Other technologies/solutions are preferred for new apps.
>
> Some projects in our company use EclipseLink's SDO implementation, so
> can we upgrade to version 3.0 or better stay on 2.7 ?
Yes, you can upgrade. If you do not plan to use JPMS, there should be no difference but if you want to use it, then 3.0 is better option going forward.
thanks,
--lukas
>
> Please, advise.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance,
>
> Aleksandr Sanitckii
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-dev mailing list
> eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e
> clipselink-dev__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!ayfq_TPXOQX-R5KSiwWZ1AWwsEqreJdvWM7
> LeOK2PcxSKcdPhV47tpurGMtCDQdeINk$
>
