| Re: [eclipselink-dev] [External] : Fwd: Investigating 571794 |
Sure. Would you mind taking me/us through it over zoom (or similar)? I think it can be more efficient. If you want, I can offer tomorrow/Wed after 8pm CET or Thu anytime.
thanks,
--lukas
On 3/30/21, 5:31 PM, "eclipselink-dev on behalf of William Dazey" <eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of dazeydev.3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anyone interested in discussing this issue? I would like to get it
resolved sooner rather than later as it is related to anything issue I
am working on / testing.
Thanks,
Will Dazey
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: William Dazey <dazeydev.3@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:08 PM
Subject: Investigating 571794
To: Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services
<eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello everyone!
I would appreciate it if you could look at
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=571794__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nsp_lpYlLiBOL-QD6K1nEvrlAhEciskYuy1at4GYaHdz_60bbCnKw9-ZSf67sn5jN6g$ and provide
feedback or thoughts on what should be done here. It may be a
controversial change if only because the JPA spec seems fairly
black/white on what the behavior is and I am advocating for expanding
on the spec because JPQL already does.
I also opened a GIT issue here:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/eclipselink/issues/1034__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nsp_lpYlLiBOL-QD6K1nEvrlAhEciskYuy1at4GYaHdz_60bbCnKw9-ZSf67PZx71WE$ and there are
PRs linked against it so that you can see what change would be made.
Thanks,
Will Dazey
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-dev mailing list
eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nsp_lpYlLiBOL-QD6K1nEvrlAhEciskYuy1at4GYaHdz_60bbCnKw9-ZSf679JG-gqg$