Re: [eclipselink-dev] Re: Code submission

[Tom Ware <tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Bjorn,

 Thanks for the email.

 In this case, the issue is just the choice of words for the subject line.

 Guy is a committer and contributing a relatively small change to the 
code base that he has developed himself.  I guess we should be careful 
not to use the words "Code Submission" when adding this kind of code.

Thanks,
Tom

Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:

> EclipseLink developers,
> Patches and code submissions should be submitted via bugzilla. If they 
> are submitted via email, they are required to go through the 
> multi-month contribution questionnaire process. Bugzilla = no delay. 
> Email = long delay. Your choice :-)
>
> See http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/ip-process-in-cartoons.php
>
> - Bjorn
>
> > Subject:
> > [eclipselink-dev] Code submission
> > From:
> > "Guy Pelletier" <guy.pelletier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:
> > Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:46:37 -0400
> > To:
> > "Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services" 
> > <eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > To:
> > "Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services" 
> > <eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > Short description: Fixed error from 
> > org.eclipse.persistence.testing.tests.validation.TargetInvocationWhileConstructorInstantiationTest 
> > when running with a security manager.
> >  
> > New tests: No. Manually tested.
> >  
> > Reviewed by: Tom Ware
> >  
> > SVN diff file attached
>
> --
>
> [end of message]
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-dev mailing list
> eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev
>