| Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] some simrel projects that (may) need some attention |
Hi,
I have removed the EGF SimRel contribution.
See: https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/187900
Regards,
Fred
On 18.11.21 17:22, Wayne Beaton wrote:
> Thanks for this Jonah.
>
> I believe that the intentions expressed by the EGF project are clear:
> the project has left the simultaneous release and we need to remove the
> corresponding aggrcon file.
>
> I'm not sure what to think about XWT and Papyrus. They are both just
> absent from the 2021-09 release, but are present on either side. They
> announced their intentions pretty clearly IMHO and nobody responded, so
> I guess that we just have to be okay with it. As I mentioned below,
> selectively dropping from a release is unprecedented and, frankly, I'm
> not sure what the implications are. The Planning Council should probably
> have some opinion on the matter.
>
> Eclipse Data Tools bothers me. It feels like something that's going to
> blow up on us. As I stated below, it hasn't been updated in the
> simultaneous release for three years. There have, however, actually been
> a couple of updates in the project's repository. Most recently (July
> 9), a committer pushed a fix "Master build is broken
> <https://git.eclipse.org/r/plugins/gitiles/datatools/org.eclipse.datatools/+/35bf9ceb237c172521a85769343d6ed0db7a1ed9>",
> but AFAICT the contribution to the simultaneous release has not changed.
> It looks like the two active committers actually made a few commits
> during that time frame, but -- again -- those changes have not been
> sponsored into the simultaneous release as of this writing.
>
> It's not at all clear to me that anybody is testing the four year old
> Eclipse ACTF bits with the latest Platform drops. This worries me.
>
> These are just the things that I noticed.
>
> Wayne
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:07 AM Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hello fellow Planning Council members,
>
> Wayne's recent email about simrel participation highlighted some
> projects that may need a review in terms of participation full email
> is below, but these projects may need a review in regards to their
> participation:
>
> - Eclipse Mylyn
> - Eclipse EGF
> - Eclipse XWT
> - Eclipse Papyrus
> - Eclipse Data Tools
> - Eclipse ACTF
>
> If anyone knows about or can tackle some of the above easily, please
> do so and let us know.
>
> Jonah
>
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com <http://www.kichwacoders.com>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Wayne Beaton* <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 00:12
> Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation
> To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>
> Greetings Simultaneous Release Participants!
>
> It's that time of the quarter again.
>
> Please have a look at the participation page
> <https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/2021-12>. If I have something
> wrong, please let me know.
>
> I've made my usual best guesses at what version of each project's
> software will be included in the 2021-12 simultaneous release. Based
> on what I see in the simrel repository, though, I think that a few
> of you need to create release records for your contributions.
>
> If your project is pushing a new version and I have the wrong
> version selected, please ensure that you have created a release
> record with the correct version number and date. If that's in place,
> then please respond to this thread with the correct version
> information (or just send me a separate note).
>
> If your project is contributing a major or minor release and has not
> engaged in a progress or release review within one year of the
> release date, then please engage the EMO ASAP to schedule a review.
>
> Note that even if you do not need to engage in a progress or release
> review, *you are responsible for ensuring that the intellectual
> property due diligence process has been completed for all of the
> contents of your release*. If you have open CQs for content that
> will be included in the release, please reach out to
> emo-records@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:emo-records@xxxxxxxxxxx> to request
> that they expedite processing.
>
> If you haven't yet, consider trying the Eclipse Dash License Tool
> <https://github.com/eclipse/dash-licenses> to review the license
> state of your project's third party content.
>
> Remember that you do not need to submit your IP Log for review if
> you are not engaging in a progress or release review. If you are
> uncertain about the status of your project's intellectual property,
> you can submit the IP Log with a comment requesting that the EMO
> review your project for conformance (when you submit an IP Log for
> review, the EMO will assume that you're initiating a release review
> unless you indicate otherwise).
>
> I've noticed a few things...
>
> Several Eclipse Mylyn features are disabled. Is this a problem? What
> is the status of this? It feels a little late to be asking this
> question, but will Eclipse Mylyn be updated in time to be included
> in the release?
>
> Eclipse EGF dropped out starting with the 2021-09 release.
> Can/should somebody remove the aggrcon file?
>
> Eclipse XWT and Eclipse Papyrus have been reactivated in the
> repository. In June
> <https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg18477.html>,
> these projects "decided to opt out of the train for this release".
> To the best of my knowledge, opting out completely (that is, not
> contributing even old bits) of a release is unprecedented, so I'm
> not sure what (if anything) special needs to be done here. AFAICT,
> nobody from the Planning Council expressed any concerns in response
> to the declaration from the project teams, so I've added them back
> in. Please let me know if this is a problem. AFAICT there is no
> release record for Eclipse XWT that corresponds to this release.
>
> There are some very old components in the simultaneous release. The
> Eclipse Data Tools features are, AFAICT, more than three years old.
> Eclipse ACTF is more than four years old. Are these features being
> tested? Is there anybody on this list representing the interests of
> these projects?
>
> Thanks for your attention.
>
> Wayne
> --
>
> Wayne Beaton
>
> Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
>
>
> --
>
> Wayne Beaton
>
> Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
--
Frederic Gurr
Release Engineer | Eclipse Foundation Europe GmbH
Berliner Allee 47, D-64295 Darmstadt
Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 92821
Managing Directors: Gaël Blondelle, Mike Milinkovich
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation