Yes, I can see that guidance from the community would be expected. Looking at the package branding on https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/ we see that many are "Eclipse IDE for *" but some are just "Eclipse for *" and those probably don't fit the current guidelines. Can you comment on their conformance to the current guidelines?
I thought we had agreement at one time to harmonize those to Eclipse IDE for ...? I've created bugs for the packages not implementing that scheme yet.