[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
] [
List Home
]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Fw: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?
From
: Oisin Hurley <
oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:46:50 +0100
Delivered-to
: eclipse.org-planning-council@eclipse.org
Dkim-signature
: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NNp72vYWQeSbRPTq+CjkbEjIWY3LCoYM8LGOfTAPJUA=; b=U8WOWrwAvSA4aOggUsXfBquB5zzP6H1yA9yeh3BhzctdNsdH/Fcf1Sr5V1wgU9yJ83 fsVCofHU0rtqpigqdgNUD9gFL5aIPozRoyfymLgF9kDNHeqId3mh3+h5azkaFJ+6eQTh XFzeR8wUvvbOwzxN0sZM5dg1hnpxShO9lBJSc=
Domainkey-signature
: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J+isYyzmR2XYmIqEN8oaNpuu/aJz6yq2gwDibzumkvyvsvARUIrIoIo2+9YjFzs3tY YKuKeK1g7Dic46EEPX88RZfny4riVq+aWfUKA+S86sMXfxHlwNPwBJjtQPupyAN4TdqB XR7gP4edvzYPo+yuq/uzGRc22k2O4AfcJegwQ=
+1 for supporting this, pending the review that David suggests. --oh
References
:
[eclipse.org-planning-council] Fw: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?
From:
David M Williams
Prev by Date:
[eclipse.org-planning-council] Fw: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?
Next by Date:
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Fw: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?
Previous by thread:
[eclipse.org-planning-council] Fw: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?
Next by thread:
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Fw: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?
Index(es):
Date
Thread