[eclipse.org-planning-council] Fw: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

We have, as a council, previously decided that new releases can merge into 
the Common Discovery site during Services Releases, so I think this is 
something we should support. 

Any objections? Comments? Concerns? 

I would recommend we review it closely for compliance to all the 
Simultaneous Release criteria. 



----- Forwarded by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 07/30/2009 05:04 PM 
-----

From:
Oliver Wolf <oliver.wolf@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Date:
07/30/2009 11:05 AM
Subject:
Can Swordfish be back for SR1?



David,

I posted this message to the planning council list, but being a non-member 
it needs moderator approval.
I?m not sure who the moderator is, so I?m forwarding it to you.

Thanks,
Oliver

------ Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Von: Oliver Wolf <oliver.wolf@xxxxxxxxx>
Datum: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:01:18 +0200
An: <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zsolt Beothy-Elo <zsolt.beothy-elo@xxxxxxxxx>
Unterhaltung: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?
Betreff: Can Swordfish be back for SR1?

Planning council members,

you probably all remember vividly the unfortunate events regarding our 
missing CQs in the Galileo release which led to removal of Swordfish from 
the Galileo update site. Please accept my apologies for all the trouble 
and extra work we have caused ? we?ve definitely learned our lesson the 
hard way.

We?ve spent quite some time on resolving those issues ? both and 
technically and process-wise ? and we would now again be in the position 
to participate in SR1. The IP team agreed to complete all our pending CQs 
in time for a new release review mid of September. 

Could you please advise me on how to proceed from here?

Thanks,
Oliver
 
------ Ende der weitergeleiteten Nachricht