+1 for the table, and having everyone interested watch the
page. I think that we should do what we can to maintain a good
signal to noise ratio with the cross projects channels, and having mail go to
everyone is noisy.
On a related note, I would like to better understand of which
messages to send to cross-projects-issues and which to eclipse.org-planning-council
in order to avoid feeling a tinge of guilt whenever I reply all to both. Should
we be sending notification/build/status messages and questions like this just
to -dev, or do they need to go to both lists?
[mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:25 PM
To: eclipse. org-planning-council; Cross project issues
Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede
EMF 2.4.0M3 has been submitted.
Does anyone/everyone like the idea of using a signoff table like this one 
for Ganymede Milestones?
I proposed that idea for Europa Winter Maintenance on Oct 2, and as yet haven't
heard any objections. As M4 is the cutoff for Ganymede participation, that
would be the logical date to start such signoffs, if not right now for M3.
Any +1s? If so I'll create a wiki page like the Europa one and send around the