| RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede |
|
+1 for the table, and having everyone interested watch the
page. I think that we should do what we can to maintain a good
signal to noise ratio with the cross projects channels, and having mail go to
everyone is noisy. On a related note, I would like to better understand of which
messages to send to cross-projects-issues and which to eclipse.org-planning-council
in order to avoid feeling a tinge of guilt whenever I reply all to both. Should
we be sending notification/build/status messages and questions like this just
to -dev, or do they need to go to both lists? Mik From:
eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nick
Boldt EMF 2.4.0M3 has been submitted.
On Nov 6, 2007 2:16 PM, Doug Schaefer < DSchaefer@xxxxxxx >
wrote: CDT
has submitted our first CDT 5 build to Ganymede as well. Doug
Schaefer, QNX Software
Systems From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Kim Moir
|