[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] question from a declined speaker
|
Hey Christian!
Can you forward your replies to both questions to this group?
I am interested in how you answered, also to be prepared for further
questions... :-)
Thanks!
-Martin
On 25.08.12 00:17, Campo, Christian wrote:
I replied to Sebastian
Von: Anne Jacko <anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Antworten an: Eclipsecon list
<eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Datum: Freitag, 24. August 2012 19:33
An: Eclipsecon list
<eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Betreff: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] question from a
declined speaker
Hi all -- If this seems like the best process, I'll post enquiries from
declined ECE speakers on the mailing list so that the PC can respond.
Perhaps Christian should answer, with input from the rest as needed?
Whatever works for you as long as we answer. (For OSGi talks, I'll send
those to the OSGi PC.)
Here's one we got today:
*From: Sebastian Zarnekow <sebastian.zarnekow@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:sebastian.zarnekow@xxxxxxxxx>>
*
*Subject: Re: EclipseCon Europe: your talk has been declined
*
*Date: August 23, 2012 8:23:09 PM PDT
*
*To: "speakers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:speakers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<speakers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:speakers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
*
*Cc: Dennis Hübner <dennis.huebner@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:dennis.huebner@xxxxxxxxx>>*
*
*
*Hi everybody,*
*
*
*I'm pretty sure you had a hard time to pick the most interesting
sessions for EclipseCon Europe 2012 and I can imagine that you get a lot
of disappointed mails right now.*
*However, I've a question regarding the comments to the proposed session
about Buckminster ('Why do EMF and Xtext build with Buckminster'). I'm
aware of the fact that there does not seem to be too much activity in
the Buckminster source reposity but this could even be a sign of
maturity and not a sign of a dead technology, can't it? *
*We put the focus of our abstract explicitly on the strength Buckminster
alone (instead of talking about weaknesses of the alternatives).
However, it would be possible to shift it slightly to a more comparitive
style. Since Dennis pretty much used any available technology in the
past to build rather complex set up Eclipse projects, he's a lot of
experience with that and knows about the drawbacks, the must-haves and
the niceties of all those (PDE build, athena, maven tycho, buckminster
... as I said pretty much everything was used). So it's not that we try
to ride a dead horse on the releng side of EMF and Xtext but that we are
convinced about the Buckminsters based technology stack. Given the fact
that Maven-CBI still strives for goals that Buckminster already reached
two years ago, we're pretty excited about that. Is there any chance that
you reconsider the decision to decline the proposed session? *
*
*
*I'm on vacation until Tuesday, 28. Sep so I won't be able to answer
immediatly to your reponse. Nevertheless, I'm looking forward to hearing
from you,*
*Sebastian*
Anne Jacko
Eclipse Foundation
503-784-3788 (cell)
-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: www.compeople.de <http://www.compeople.de/>
Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
