[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Average feedback on talks
|
Hi
to be fair to all speakers we also must take into account that the web site was not working well on (at least) the first day. I'm not sure if anyone has entered feedback for "yesterdays talks".
We also should avoid growing a group of "the usual suspects" for a conference by promoting "rock stars". In my opinion the OOP conference suffers from this problem (same people and similar talks every year).
Achim
On 14.11.2011, at 10:03, Tom Schindl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the idea to promote the people with the best feedback is a good
> idea but i think we should have advertised the voting more. e.g. telling
> the speakers to remind people to vote after the talk, ... .
>
> I also think that one needs at least 10 votes to get considered.
>
> Tom
>
> Am 11.11.11 16:13, schrieb Campo, Christian:
>> Since no one steps forward, I do......
>>
>> If you look at the list there are quite some talks with 4 votes where I
>> think that is just not enough vote-material. So a conservative approach
>> could be to require 5 votes or more.....
>>
>> But heh we are talking Rockstars right ? The votes that impress me
>> personally are 10 or more votes. So what does everyoneelse thinks ?
>>
>> (its more or less a thing whether Ian Bull wins (7 votes) or Marcel
>> Bruch(17 votes) :-) )
>>
>> christian
>>
>> Am 10.11.2011 um 22:17 schrieb Ian Skerrett:
>>
>>> I agree the PC should set a minimum number of votes. Not sure if we
>>> can announce the list during the conference, since some people provide
>>> feedback afterwards. We could create a community bulletin and post
>>> it on eclipse.org <http://eclipse.org> home page. That would get a
>>> bit more visibility than just my blog :-)
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2011 3:57 PM, Campo, Christian wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think thats a great idea. So showing the top 3 or 5 is a good
>>>> thing.....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are two concerns I have:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Having a 4.6 (as an example) with 2 votes is totally different
>>>> from 4.6. with 20 votes. We might want to have a minimum number of
>>>> votes (4, 7, 10 whaever) before a talk is considered as getting into
>>>> the top 5. (These rules can be public)
>>>>
>>>> 2. As much as I love Ian's blog :-) , posting the 5 top scorer there
>>>> or on the eclipse website is not the same as calling the speakers up
>>>> on stage in the closing session. That would be really cool, I believe.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we can work on making that happen in future EclipseCon's.
>>>>
>>>> christian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 10.11.2011 um 19:07 schrieb Ian Skerrett:
>>>>
>>>>> As an idea, would the PC like to recognize the 'top' speakers,
>>>>> something like the JavaOne rock stars?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/10/2011 9:56 AM, Christopher Guindon wrote:
>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've create a page for the PC to review the average result for each
>>>>>> talk. You can access this page using the following URL :
>>>>>> http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2011/evaluation/all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or feedback!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ian Skerrett
>>>>> VP of Marketing and Ecosystem
>>>>> Eclipse Foundation
>>>>> Tel: 613-224-9461 ext 227
>>>>> Blog: ianskerrett.wordpress.com <http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/>
>>>>> Twitter: IanSkerrett <http://twitter.com/IanSkerrett>
>>>>> <ATT00001..c>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> compeople AG
>>>> Untermainanlage 8
>>>> 60329 Frankfurt/Main
>>>> fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
>>>> fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
>>>> web: www.compeople.de <http://www.compeople.de/>
>>>>
>>>> Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
>>>> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
>>>>
>>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
>>>> Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
>>>> Ust-Ident.-Nr: DE207665352
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
>>>> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian Skerrett
>>> VP of Marketing and Ecosystem
>>> Eclipse Foundation
>>> Tel: 613-224-9461 ext 227
>>> Blog: ianskerrett.wordpress.com <http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/>
>>> Twitter: IanSkerrett <http://twitter.com/IanSkerrett>
>>> <ATT00001..c>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
>> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
>
>
> --
> B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 935833
> http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 935834
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
