Re: [eclipse-dev] Making platform bundles more reuseable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipse-dev] Making platform bundles more reuseable - A Mars target?

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:15:55 +0200
Delivered-to: eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipse-dev>
List-help: <mailto:eclipse-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev>, <mailto:eclipse-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/eclipse-dev>, <mailto:eclipse-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

On 05/17/2014 02:21 PM, Tom Schindl wrote:

Are we fine with split-packages?

Split package can cause troubles to p2 or even OSGi (when using Import-Package instead of Require-Bundle). On one side, there are people wanting better OSGi practices in Eclipse such as using Require-Bundle, and one the other side, you now want split-packages. Both are not compatible.
As an "integrator" of Eclipse, I would definitely like to avoid split-packages which make things more complex to assemble things.

Cheers

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipse-dev] Making platform bundles more reuseable - A Mars target?
  - From: Tom Schindl

References:
- [eclipse-dev] Making platform bundles more reuseable - A Mars target?
  - From: Tom Schindl

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipse-dev] Making platform bundles more reuseable - A Mars target?
Next by Date: Re: [eclipse-dev] Making platform bundles more reuseable - A Mars target?
Previous by thread: Re: [eclipse-dev] Making platform bundles more reuseable - A Mars target?
Next by thread: Re: [eclipse-dev] Making platform bundles more reuseable - A Mars target?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs