Re: [e4-dev] Resources 6-Mar-2009 meeting notes

[Francis Upton <francisu@xxxxxxxx>]

Great, that's how I thought it should work, and I'm happy with that. 

I can be responsible for keeping the e4 branch periodically up to date (probably at milestones or something like that) for the CNF stuff.

Perhaps if we identify a person for each plugin then that would be enough.  I think I have commit rights on e4 now.

Francis

Paul Webster wrote:

2009/3/6 Francis Upton <francisu@xxxxxxxx>:
  

Ok, just to be clear then, we would move the CNF work to the e4 branch and
then I would periodically merge it into HEAD?
    

Oh, no, it goes the other way.  You would do regular CNF work in the
real project in HEAD.  The e4 work would go in an e4 branch in the
forked project.  At some regular interval, HEAD from the real project
would be merged into HEAD in the e4 forked project.

e4 work that's ready to be released into 3.x is a different problem
that comes later :-)

PW

  

-- 
You have brains in your head.
You have feet in your shoes.
- Dr Seuss, Oh the Places You'll Go

Francis Upton IV
francis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tel   510 835 3123
Fax   510 779 5226
Cell  510 432 1589
Skype francisupton