Re: [e4-dev] Resources 6-Mar-2009 meeting notes

[Francis Upton <francisu@xxxxxxxx>]

Ok, just to be clear then, we would move the CNF work to the e4 branch and then I would periodically merge it into HEAD?

That sounds a little scary to me, since I'm going to be doing a lot of fixes for M7 which of course can't involve API changes.  Though I have not thought though the ease of porting if we went the other way.

I'm also totally unfamiliar with git, which seems to be the answer to many of the world's pressing problems these days.

Francis

Paul Webster wrote:

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Paul Webster
<pwebster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  

It seems like the cleanest way to work would be to for the project and
then work in an e4 branch.
    

If I turn this into a real sentence it would probably look like "It
seems like the cleanest way to work would be to copy the project over
to e4 and then work in an e4 branch".

PW

  

-- 
You have brains in your head.
You have feet in your shoes.
- Dr Seuss, Oh the Places You'll Go

Francis Upton IV
francis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tel   510 835 3123
Fax   510 779 5226
Cell  510 432 1589
Skype francisupton