[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF Project Proposal
|
Hi,
I would suggest keeping the TCF/RSE integration with TCF, because it is
more closely related to TCF. In fact it has initially been built as an
"exemplary tool" to showcase TCF, and can remain just that at least
until Doug's RSE-less target navigator is available for adopters.
- RSE users who don't have a TCF target surely won't care
about the integration.
- On the other hand, TCF users who don't have RSE can use
the code as programming example for TCF.
Moreover, the integration has been in the TCF repository in the past and
has been on the TCF release cycle, so keeping it that way just seems
easier.
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6
-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 7:24 PM
To: DSDP TCF dev list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF Project Proposal
Good question. My intention is to provide a TCF Targets view using the
common navigator that would allow us to provide an extensible UI entry
point to the TCF world without requiring RSE. So the RSE community may
have more of a vested interest in keeping the RSE integration going and,
as such, should probably remain in TM.
Doug.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Anna Dushistova
<anna_dushistova@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just wondering, is the RSE integration plugin still be under the TM
project?
>
> Anna.
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:52 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>
>> Hey gang,
>>
>> As Martin O mentioned earlier, there is a break up of the old DSDP
>> happening and the pieces are finding new homes.
>>
>> While this is happening, I think it's time to promote TCF to full
>> project status from it's current home in Target Management. We're
>> seeing a lot of interest in TCF from various embedded tooling vendors
>> and I anticipate it growing rapidly over the next few months. Since
>> there is little overlap in the technologies behind TCF and TM, it
>> makes sense to break it out.
>>
>> The proposal is to bring TCF as a subproject of CDT. There is a huge
>> overlap in communities there so it would be good to keep it close to
>> the fold, but not too close to lose it's identity as a generic target
>> communication facility. Being a subproject doesn't mean too much
>> other than, as lead of both, I get to report to myself. Beyond that,
>> it'll look like any other project at Eclipse, but we'll manage it
>> close to CDT as far as deliverables, i.e builds, go.
>>
>> I will be putting together a list of initial committers which will
>> comprise of the existing committers to the existing TCF code base,
>> plus myself as the TCF project lead. I would also like to put
>> together a list of interested parties who will hopefully become
>> committers in the future. Please let me know if you'd like to be on
this list.
>>
>> I'll publish the new project proposal once I get it together. And
>> we'll have some good discussions on TCF at the CDT summit coming up
>> in September, which you all are invited to as well.
>>
>> As always, please let me know what you think.
>> Cheers,
>> Doug
>> _______________________________________________
>> dsdp-tcf-dev mailing list
>> dsdp-tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tcf-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tcf-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tcf-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tcf-dev mailing list
dsdp-tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tcf-dev
