RE: [dsdp-pmc] MTJ Reboot - New Initial Committer List

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [dsdp-pmc] MTJ Reboot - New Initial Committer List

From: "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:43:44 -0500
Delivered-to: dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>, <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>, <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Thread-index: Acgq4J8UidcERq+BS1+t+pNHitbl+QAA307g

There is no such rule that I am aware of. It is, however, an obviously good practice J

In fact, I’m not sure I’ve read the rule that a project lead needs to be a committer at all. I may just have missed it, though.

References:
- RE: [dsdp-pmc] MTJ Reboot - New Initial Committer List
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: RE: [dsdp-pmc] MTJ Reboot - New Initial Committer List
Next by Date: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Introducing the RTSC proposed project
Previous by thread: RE: [dsdp-pmc] MTJ Reboot - New Initial Committer List
Next by thread: [dsdp-pmc] Introducing the RTSC proposed project
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top