RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution

From: "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:30:05 -0400
Delivered-to: dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/dsdp-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>, <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>, <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Thread-index: Acbh12U4AX5IalbzQDejOMNsn1OkRAANW3rwABOQOJAACQw78AA1PoAQ

Title: Code contribution

The source code needs to be freely available, including for our review and analysis. AFAIK, it is not *required* that source be in CVS.

I may also be slightly confused from Mike’s last email. Mike: are projects allowed to redistribute only binaries as long as the source code that goes with them is freely available from another website and the license on the binary is compatible with Eclipse? Or is the expectation that the source code will live with the binary in CVS?

References:
- RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
  - From: Gaff, Doug

Prev by Date: RE: [dsdp-pmc] FW: Please ask PMC for vote on Rodrigo for Committer
Next by Date: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
Previous by thread: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
Next by thread: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs