It probably makes more sense to attempt to move to version 3, than to go back to 2.2.1On Apr 2, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Raniere Hugo-wha006 wrote: I see, well, in order to get a quick approval I think we should change the CQ to consider ASM 3, allowing us to commit it into SVN sooner. Then we can verify if EclipseME refactored code works with ASM 3. If it does not work, we can either adapt the code to ASM 3 or try to have ASM 2.2.2 approved. What do you guys think about that approach? Hugo I have not tried any other versions. It is likely that 2.2.1 could work... although it may be missing a necessary bug fix (I was working with the ASM guys while I worked on this to get necessary bug fixes into ASM). I've not tried ASM 3, nor do I have a feeling for whether it would work in place of ASM 2.2.2. On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Raniere Hugo-wha006 wrote:
Thanks for the information. I’ve already attached to the CQ the source code necessary. I’ve got another question to you concerning the ASM dependency. We filed a CQ for ASM version 2.2.2 There are other versions of ASM already approved to use by eclipse. Do you know if EclipseME works with a different version? If yes, which one (1.5.3, 2.2.1, 3.0 or 3.1)? Thanks, Hugo The website generator isn't of interest... It is primarily used to add the necessary code to the EclipseME web site to add Google Ads. (which I just realized I'm going to lose when transitioning to MTJ... hmm). In terms of the manual folder, I had actually forgotten about that being there. In certain cases, the tool was having trouble doing an automatic translation. The manual folder contains empty API classes that I had to build out to some extent by hand. It is an integral part of the empty API generation. In terms of copyright/license, they should all have my standard copyright and be EPL licensed.... not that there is really anything that useful in there. These will need to be added to the CQ. On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Raniere Hugo-wha006 wrote: Basically I’ve found 2 tools there: - EmptyAPIGenerator: I’ll attach its source code to the existing EclipseME CQ. I’ve a question about the contents existent in the eclipse-me-tools/manual folder. Are they used by the EmptyAPIGenerator?
- Website Generator: Right now I don’t think it is necessary to submit this code, as we don’t have a clear definition of how the documentation will be presented on MTJ site. If necessary, we can submit this code in the future. What is your opnion about that?
Is there any other code that you think that should be submitted? Looking forward to hearing from you,
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
|
