[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Model

The current MTJ services are using an EMF based model, that is initially created with any EMF compatible tool.
The tools that Kevin is referring here and what e.g. I have used is the a bit older Rational Rose tool to create the UML model.
I think that even some very old version of Rose can be used with this.
Thus the same model can be done with other tools, like IBM Rational Architect or Modeler or what ever (or even directly with the EMF).
When thinking the current MTJ architecture, there is certainly needed to discuss that does team members have experience on EMF or not.
In case of that would be replaced, it pretty much means that the whole MTJ internal architecture have to be recoded also.
As comparing to other Eclipse based projects, some of those are not using EMF at all and they do model their data model e.g. with plain java.
As it is e.g. with EclipseME (Craig, correct me if I'm wrong).
Why the EMF has been used here, well that enables to have a Eclipse compatible and working data layer, where the initial design is done
with UML and the the MTJ related EMF layer is generated from the UML file. That saves a lot of coding & testing time.
In my part I have to say that if the EMF layer is dropped, I may have problems to participate to create the same functionality again from Nokia
point of view.

From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Raniere Hugo-wha006
Sent: 14. marraskuuta 2007 16:33
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Model

Hi Kevin,


I’m one of the guys at Motorola intending to work in MTJ. I agree with you that having this kind of dependencies may not be good for the project, and one of the tasks we are proposing in this MTJ reboot is to have an new proposed architecture by beginning of next year. For sure we can review the data model for this new proposed architecture.


During the meeting we are also going to talk about the proposed planning (more info on mtj wiki). If the meeting time is not enough to discuss about the data model, we can set a new activity in the planning to analyze the data model.


Best regards,



From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin M Horowitz
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 11:11 AM
To: dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Model



I realize this is a little late for today's meeting, but I would like to suggest that as part of the reset, we open the idea of the current data model behind the MTJ project.  The model stores all of the relational data about devices and setup.  The model is generated using a Rational product, and then converted using the EMF project.  Arto provided instructions at the very end of our relationship explaining how this code is generated, but this ties us to a commercial product that many of our participants might not have in the future, and makes modifications to the underlaying data structure difficult to maintain my team members.  

Kevin Horowitz
Expeditor Tools Development
Workplace Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM - Boca Raton, +1-561-862-2113