RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Feature List and Contribution toUC& Development w

[<Arto.Laurila@xxxxxxxxx>]

As considering the amount of current tasks for release 1.0 and 
comparing that to our current resourcing, there is not so much
extra that we could do there.

But, the situation changes immediately if we get more contributions ;-)

So, if you Görkem are willing to participate to the development, then 
we do not have any problem to start creating a better christmas to eRCP
project ;-)

-Arto

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 24 November, 2006 14:30
>To: dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Feature List and Contribution 
>toUC& Development work
>
>Any support from community?
>
>	Rauno 
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>>[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext 
>Gorkem Ercan
>>Sent: 21 November, 2006 12:29
>>To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Feature List and Contribution to UC& 
>>Development work
>>
>>I would like to propose new feature items for consideration 
>relating to 
>>eRCP.
>>
>>eRCP development being a subset of the RCP benefits from all the 
>>goodness that comes with the PDE but PDE does not really cover some 
>>specialities with eRCP and mobile.
>>I would like to see some features on MTJ that complement PDE. 
>>Here is my christmas list.
>>
>>1. eRCP application project templates similar to RCP project 
>templates.
>>(Hello world eRCP application, eRCP application with a View
>>etc.) [High priority] 2. Management of build path. eRCP applications 
>>are targeted for nothing but CDC, currently PDE(at least on 3.2) does 
>>not manage that only access to CDC is available even if the runtime 
>>supports java se 1.x. I guess the easiest way to have this would be 
>>adding access rules to runtime.
>>[Hig Priority]
>>3. Exporting/packing eRCP applications for target mobile
>>platforms: I am not sure how many platforms can be covered but I am 
>>thinking at least a framework that works nicely with PDE export to 
>>provide install packages like .sis files etc.
>>[Medium priority] 4. Running eRCP applications on mobile 
>emulators. By 
>>default PDE works only with the windows desktop 
>implementation of eRCP, 
>>MTJ can extend PDE to provide run/debug support for eRCP applications 
>>on the emulator [Low priority]
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Görkem Ercan
>>eRCP project lead.
>>
>>Rauno.Seppala@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As the feature list hasn't got any objection we may agree 
>that to be 
>>> frozen. If you have anything against that, please say it now!
>>>
>>> Please, note the project is schedule driven and
>>implementation of all
>>> the features may not be possible.
>>>
>>> There is also a wiki page 'Status of Use Cases and Contributors' 
>>> (_http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Status_of_Use_Cases_). 
>>The purpose
>>> is to give a compact status of the work and resourcing.
>>>
>>> I would like to gather there participants for both use case and 
>>> development work. Please fill in there if you 
>(yourself/company) are 
>>> willing to contiribute either or both of them.
>>>
>>>         BRs,
>>>
>>>                 Rauno
>>>
>>> 
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>>> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>>>   
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>>dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>>
>_______________________________________________
>dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>