Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Support for non-UEI emulator

Mika,

It is mandatory because we have always claimed to support any J2ME library, and by just having UEI, we are limited to MIDP. We have always agreed that support might be lacking for other libraries, but that they would work if you built an SDK. This is something that we have insisted upon during the entire project. We can't limit ourselves to MIDP for the release. All of our documentation lists that we are capable of supporting non-MIDP projects.

kevin
-----------------------------
Kevin Horowitz (khorowit@xxxxxxxxxx)
IBM Software Group - WPLC
8051 Congress Ave.
Boca Raton, Fl 33487
+1-561-862-2113 (t/l 975)

Inactive hide details for <mika.hoikkala@xxxxxxxxx><mika.hoikkala@xxxxxxxxx>


          <mika.hoikkala@xxxxxxxxx>
          Sent by: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

          10/19/2006 07:42 AM

          Please respond to
          Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list <dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

<dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc


Subject

[dsdp-mtj-dev] Support for non-UEI emulator

Hi,

Kevin.
I saw you commented that it is mandatory feature to support non-uei emulators.

I generally agree, but would like to get some clarity to the issue:

1) Why it is mandatory to get it to 0.7 release?
2) Although generally good requirement, do somebody requested that? ("Customer")

3) In management terms what is the problem to get it in?

mho _______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top