Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] IP-XACT version for Ganymede release

It sounds like you have a good user community, so I think we're in good
shape. It is possible to keep this part at a sub-1.0 version number if
so desired, but I'm not sure this is necessary.

The release review will happen in June, along with the rest of the
Ganymede projects.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Berent
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:58 AM
> To: Device Debugging developer discussions
> Subject: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] IP-XACT version for Ganymede release
> 
> Doug,
> 
> I am happy to write up some more detailed comments on this a few weeks
> time (when I will be slightly less busy), but, in summary, the
position
> is that IP-XACT seems to being widely adopted by EDA vendors, and is
> starting to be adopted by silicon IP suppliers and SoC designers.
There
> is, however, no significant take-up among debugger vendors.
> 
> The editor is being used, particularly for its semantic checker, by
> many
> of the contributing members of the SPIRIT consortium, and by a number
> of
> other companies. Parts of it are also in use (I think) in two
> commercial
> products.
> 
> When is the release review?
> 
> If we judge that the editor is not at 1.0 quality, is it possible to
> keep this at pre-1.0 status while releasing the rest of DD as 1.0?
> 
> - Anthony
> 
> 
> dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The other facet of 1.0 quality relates to how well the
> > technology helps the "other" communities: users and adopters.
> > It will be important in the release review of the DD 1.0
> > project to state what these communities look like. Since
> > IP-XACT at this point is not (at this point anyway) directly
> > connected to the rest of DD from a technical perspective, I'd
> > like to make sure we're able to talk about the adoption of
> > IP-XACT by the community in the release review.
> >
> > So, we're really looking for comment from you about the
> > adoption of IP-XACT by other companies and by the SPIRIT user
> > community.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-
> >> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Berent
> >> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 9:46 AM
> >> To: Device Debugging developer discussions
> >> Subject: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] IP-XACT version for Ganymede release
> >>
> >> Doug,
> >>
> >> I hope so. I have not seen an explicit definition of 1.0 quality,
> but
> >> my assumption is that it means release quality in non-Eclipse
terms.
> >> I think the code of version I have (not the version on the Eclipse
> >> CVS) is quite close now, but I need to do some more work on the
> >> tests ( both the automated tests and formalizing the manual tests).
> >> It might also benefit from 3rd party review, if anybody is willing
> >> to review it.
> >>
> >> Note that, because my private version incorporates support for
> >> IP-XACT
> >> 1.4, which is not yet a public standard, I have been putting off
> >> updating the Eclipse CVS. As a result the version on the Eclipse
CVS
> >> is badly out of date. Now that IP-XACT 1.4 is about to be released,
> >> this should stop being a problem.
> >>
> >> Maybe I should delay changing the version number until I have
> >> completed the work on the tests etc. This is something that can
> >> easily be done late in the Ganymede cycle.
> >>
> >> - Anthony
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> Anthony,
> >>>
> >>> Is the IP-XACT editor going to be at 1.0 quality by June (when
> >>> Ganymede releases)?
> >>>
> >>> Doug
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-
> >>>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Berent
> >>>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 4:42 AM
> >>>> To: Device Debugging developer discussions
> >>>> Subject: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] IP-XACT version for Ganymede release
> >>>>
> >>>> Ted, Pavel,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have no problem changing it to 1.0. I will do this over the
next
> >>>> few weeks.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Anthony
> >>>>
> >>>> dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>>>> For sake of consistency I think the plugins should use version
> >>>>> 1.0. Anthony, any comment?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Pawel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ted Williams wrote:
> >>>>>> Anthony / Pawel,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The IP-XACT feature and plugins currently supply a version of
> >>>>>> "0.2.0".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Will this be the version used for the Ganymede release? Or must
> >>>>>> all of the DSDP-DD components be 1.0.0 by release?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ted
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> >>>>>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> >>>>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> >>>>
> >>>> --------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Anthony Berent
> >>>>
> >>>> ARM Ltd
> >>>>
> >>>> +44 1223 400763
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments
> >>>> are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
> >>>> intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do
> >>>> not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any
> >>>> purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium.  Thank
> >>>> you.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> >>>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> >>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> >>
> >> --------------------------
> >>
> >> Anthony Berent
> >>
> >> ARM Ltd
> >>
> >> +44 1223 400763
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> >> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> > dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> 
> --------------------------
> 
> Anthony Berent
> 
> ARM Ltd
> 
> +44 1223 400763
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev


Back to the top