[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] IP-XACT version for Ganymede release
|
Doug,
I am happy to write up some more detailed comments on this a few weeks
time (when I will be slightly less busy), but, in summary, the position
is that IP-XACT seems to being widely adopted by EDA vendors, and is
starting to be adopted by silicon IP suppliers and SoC designers. There
is, however, no significant take-up among debugger vendors.
The editor is being used, particularly for its semantic checker, by many
of the contributing members of the SPIRIT consortium, and by a number of
other companies. Parts of it are also in use (I think) in two commercial
products.
When is the release review?
If we judge that the editor is not at 1.0 quality, is it possible to
keep this at pre-1.0 status while releasing the rest of DD as 1.0?
- Anthony
dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The other facet of 1.0 quality relates to how well the
> technology helps the "other" communities: users and adopters.
> It will be important in the release review of the DD 1.0
> project to state what these communities look like. Since
> IP-XACT at this point is not (at this point anyway) directly
> connected to the rest of DD from a technical perspective, I'd
> like to make sure we're able to talk about the adoption of
> IP-XACT by the community in the release review.
>
> So, we're really looking for comment from you about the
> adoption of IP-XACT by other companies and by the SPIRIT user
> community.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-
>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Berent
>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 9:46 AM
>> To: Device Debugging developer discussions
>> Subject: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] IP-XACT version for Ganymede release
>>
>> Doug,
>>
>> I hope so. I have not seen an explicit definition of 1.0 quality, but
>> my assumption is that it means release quality in non-Eclipse terms.
>> I think the code of version I have (not the version on the Eclipse
>> CVS) is quite close now, but I need to do some more work on the
>> tests ( both the automated tests and formalizing the manual tests).
>> It might also benefit from 3rd party review, if anybody is willing
>> to review it.
>>
>> Note that, because my private version incorporates support for
>> IP-XACT
>> 1.4, which is not yet a public standard, I have been putting off
>> updating the Eclipse CVS. As a result the version on the Eclipse CVS
>> is badly out of date. Now that IP-XACT 1.4 is about to be released,
>> this should stop being a problem.
>>
>> Maybe I should delay changing the version number until I have
>> completed the work on the tests etc. This is something that can
>> easily be done late in the Ganymede cycle.
>>
>> - Anthony
>>
>>
>>
>> dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> Anthony,
>>>
>>> Is the IP-XACT editor going to be at 1.0 quality by June (when
>>> Ganymede releases)?
>>>
>>> Doug
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-
>>>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Berent
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 4:42 AM
>>>> To: Device Debugging developer discussions
>>>> Subject: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] IP-XACT version for Ganymede release
>>>>
>>>> Ted, Pavel,
>>>>
>>>> I have no problem changing it to 1.0. I will do this over the next
>>>> few weeks.
>>>>
>>>> - Anthony
>>>>
>>>> dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> For sake of consistency I think the plugins should use version
>>>>> 1.0. Anthony, any comment?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Pawel
>>>>>
>>>>> Ted Williams wrote:
>>>>>> Anthony / Pawel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The IP-XACT feature and plugins currently supply a version of
>>>>>> "0.2.0".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will this be the version used for the Ganymede release? Or must
>>>>>> all of the DSDP-DD components be 1.0.0 by release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ted
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
>>>>>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
>>>>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Anthony Berent
>>>>
>>>> ARM Ltd
>>>>
>>>> +44 1223 400763
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments
>>>> are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
>>>> intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do
>>>> not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any
>>>> purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank
>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
>>>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
>>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
>>
>> --------------------------
>>
>> Anthony Berent
>>
>> ARM Ltd
>>
>> +44 1223 400763
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
>> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
--------------------------
Anthony Berent
ARM Ltd
+44 1223 400763
