[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] DSF on new flexible hierarchy APIs
|
I think we should keep the exact process open right now:
1. Pick up the latest integration build to get Darin's changes.
2. For future integration builds, let's try them as they come out. It
will better prepare us for M4.
If picking up regular integration builds turns out to be too
destabilizing, we can move back to pickup up milestones only.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pawel Piech
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:39 AM
> To: Device Debugging developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [dsdp-dd-dev] DSF on new flexible hierarchy APIs
>
> For practial purposes, it should be enough to make sure that we at
> least
> compile and pass the unit tests that we have.
> Still, I'm not sure whether it makes sense to try to keep up with all
> the integration builds, or only switch to them as needed. The new
> flexible hierarchy interfaces represent a massive API change, and it's
> not likely we'll see that kind of thing again in 3.3.
> Thanks
> Pawel
>
> Williams, Ted wrote:
> > The DD plugins are currently built nightly against 3.3M3. I suggest
> we
> > begin building against platform integration builds. If we document a
> > test plan for DSF, I'll make sure the tests pass before moving to
the
> > latest integration build.
> >
> > Any other ideas from the community?
> >
> > ted
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pawel Piech
> > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 5:00 PM
> > To: Device Debugging developer discussions
> > Subject: [dsdp-dd-dev] DSF on new flexible hierarchy APIs
> >
> > Hi Ted,
> > I finished the initial port of DSF to the new viewer APIs, but I'm
> not
> > sure whether to check it into CVS or not. I believe that DD plugins
> are
> > being built against M3, so checking in the changes would break the
> > build... any suggestions? For the time being I just attached a
patch
> to
> > the 164341 bug.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Pawel
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> > dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> > dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
