Re: [dsdp-dd-dev] Disassembly View Requirement

[Samantha Chan <chanskw@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the clarification :)

Samantha




                                                                           
             "Mikhail                                                      
             Khodjaiants"                                                  
             <mikhailk@xxxxxxx                                          To 
             >                         "Device Debugging developer         
             Sent by:                  discussions"                        
             dsdp-dd-dev-bounc         <dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>           
             es@xxxxxxxxxxx                                             cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             05/30/2006 05:40          Re: [dsdp-dd-dev] Disassembly View  
             PM                        Requirement                         
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             Device Debugging                                              
                 developer                                                 
                discussions                                                
             <dsdp-dd-dev@ecli                                             
                 pse.org>                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           




Samantha,

>Showing disassembly in the Memory View was one of CDT's requirements.

The CDT requirement is showing memory as disassembly, not showing
disassembly in the Memory view. It can be implemented as an additional
memory rendering, but we have never thought of it as a full replacement of
the Disassembly view.

Mikhail Khodjaiants
----- Original Message -----
From: "Samantha Chan" <chanskw@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Device Debugging developer discussions" <dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] Disassembly View Requirement


> Hi -
>
> Re:  R1 Generic Disassembly View
> Are we having a separate disassembly view?  Or are we looking at
> displaying
> disassembly as a rendering in the Memory View?  Showing disassembly in
the
> Memory View was one of CDT's requirements.
>
> Re:  Portable disassembly component
> One of the requirements is to make showing disassembly as a portable
> component and it can be "plugged" into any view or editor or anywhere we
> need it.  e.g. the Modules View
>
> Re:  Optimized code:
> I think there is another requirement for dealing with optimized code.
> Kirt
> Beitz from Freescale indicated that they have cases where there is no
> 1-to-1 mapping between instructions and source code either way.  They
need
> to be able to show disassembly and source side-by-side, not interlacing.
> They need to be able to highlight several non-contigous lines of
> instructions per source line... or highlight several non-contiguous lines
> of source lines per instruction.
>
> Re:  Input to disassembly
> Does it make sense to add a requirement to allow this disassembly
> component
> to accept any input for creating the disassembly "view"?  e.g. We have
> cases where it makes sense for the disassembly component to disassemble
> memory from a memory block and show it as disassembly instructions.  In
> other cases, we can have a binary file as input and display its content
as
> disassembly.
>
> Thanks...
> Samantha
>
>
>
>
>             "Ewa Matejska"
>             <Ewa.Matejska@pal
>             msource.com>                                               To
>             Sent by:                  "Device Debugging developer
>             dsdp-dd-dev-bounc         discussions"
>             es@xxxxxxxxxxx            <dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>                                                                        cc
>
>             05/30/2006 04:52                                      Subject
>             PM                        RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] Disassembly View
>                                       Requirement
>
>             Please respond to
>             Device Debugging
>                 developer
>                discussions
>             <dsdp-dd-dev@ecli
>                 pse.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The requirement of mixed mode/assembly/source toggle is also an Editor
> Subgroup requirement.  We should coordinate and work together on this.
> Some of the other requirements seem relevant to the Editor as well, such
> as
> the multiple breakpoint icons.
>
> Thanks,
> Ewa.
>
> From: dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuong, Patrick
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:23 PM
> To: Device Debugging developer discussions
> Subject: [dsdp-dd-dev] Disassembly View Requirement
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have updated the disassembly twiki website with the requirements that I
> have gather through multiple email threads in the archive. Any feedback
> and
> additional requirement is welcome. Additionally, I suggest that we keep
> one
> discussion thread for the disassembly view requirement. This can be
> related
> to the CDT disassembly view or Disassembly renderer in the Memory view.
>
> Regards,
> Patrick_______________________________________________
> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev

_______________________________________________
dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev