Hi,
All CQs are approved!
The Gerrit patch can be merged now. Please, let me know if anyone still plans to do any code review. If I don't hear anything I will merge the patch in the afternoon.
I will also nominate Michal and Bartek for DLTK committers, so they can maintain and improve the new indexer.
Kaloyan
From: dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Kaloyan Raev <kaloyan.r@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 11:51 AM
To: DLTK Developer Discussions
Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Apache Lucene indexer for DLTK
I also submitted a CQ for the code change itself: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
Kaloyan
From: dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Kaloyan Raev <kaloyan.r@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:15 AM
To: DLTK Developer Discussions
Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Apache Lucene indexer for DLTK
OK. Now it sounds very promising that it will fit the Neon time frame.
I submitted the following two CQs:
- https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11192
- https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11193
Kaloyan
From: dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <dltk-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of akurtakov <akurtakov@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 8:55 PM
To: DLTK Developer Discussions
Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] Apache Lucene indexer for DLTK
Both are approved so getting piggyback cqs approved shouldn't be a problem for neon. I can speak to IP team if needed to try speeding it up.
Regards,
Alex
|