Re: FW: RE: [dali-dev] Dali 1.0 Package and Plugin Name Change Notice

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

You might want to read the Eclispe Naming
Conventions, http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Naming_Conventions, and
see if consistent. I seems you new ones are more 
consistent, but not quite. And, they
do not _have_ to be perfiect consistent ... I recall some other cases in
WTP where we felt the guidelines end up with less than ideal names. 
(but dont' recall the details). So ...
I'm just suggesting you know whether or not you comply, and if not, perhaps
document the reasons why you thought it would be bad to do so. 

And, if you have any suggestions on
how the guidelines should be changed, perhaps you could add them to the
'talk' page. of that wike article. 

Two other suggestions: 
1. You might want to do your naming
in clear, distinct phases ... one build for example, with just the first
change with removal of jst done. , then another build with the 'internal'
changes made. 
This _might_ help people migrate, if
they migrated their own code in steps. 

2. You might consider saving the "refactoring
scripts" you can have generated and offer that to you clients to help
them rename their code. (I think that aiblity is in the base Eclipse now
.... and I'm sure it's no silver bullet, but might be worth a try). 

Thanks,

Brian Vosburgh <BRIAN.VOSBURGH@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dali-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/28/2007 12:37 AM

Please respond to
"General Dali EJB ORM developer discussion." <dali-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	dali-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	FW: RE: [dali-dev] Dali 1.0 Package and Plugin Name Change Notice

While renaming our plugins, we should also rename
some of our packages:

        Current Name          
                     Proposed
Name
    jpa.core plugin
        ...jpa.core.java.internal      
     ...jpa.core.internal.java
        ...jpa.core.java.internal.util    
  ...jpa.core.internal.java.util

    jpa.utility plugin
        ...jpa.internal.utility      
       ...jpa.utility.internal
        ...jpa.internal.utility.iterators    ...jpa.utility.internal.iterators

    jpa.utility.tests plugin
        ...jpa.utility.tests        
        ...jpa.utility.tests.internal
        ...jpa.utility.tests.iterators    
  ...jpa.utility.tests.internal.iterators

The proposed names simply move the "internal" package name node
to immediately
following the plugin name portion of the package name.

Does this make sense?
Brian

_______________________________________________
dali-dev mailing list
dali-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dali-dev