Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dali-dev] Special version of RDB 
Arthur,
I think we have decided to target our current development iteration at the WTP 1.0 stream, which will complete early in February. From there, we will start to work and build against the 1.5 stream. Related to DTP migration, I was not aware the WTP had decided to continue to support the RDB component for 1.5 and not migrate to DTP. I thought this was part of the plan for 1.5, but I guess that has changed? 

Neil

Arthur Ryman wrote:



Neil,
Since the plan is for Dali to ship with WTP 1.5, then early feeback is desriable, especially on the Data tools issue since WTP 1.5 will reship the Data Tools, i,e. not migrate to DTP yet. 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx


*Neil Hauge <neil.hauge@xxxxxxxxxx>*
Sent by: dali-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/18/2006 11:39 AM
Please respond to
neil.hauge and "General Dali EJB ORM developer discussion."


	
To
	"General Dali EJB ORM developer discussion." <dali-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
	
Subject
	Re: [dali-dev] Special version of RDB



	





That reminds me to send out an email on our dependencies.

Our target platform has been Eclipse 3.1.1 and WTP 1.0.  The question is
whether we should now switch over to Eclipse 3.2 M4 and WTP 1.5 M4.  For
now we should probably remain targeted at 3.1.1 and WTP 1.0, with a plan
to move to the 3.2/1.5 stream as soon as it is reasonable to do so.  To
find out if it is reasonable, I will start doing some testing on the
3.2/1.5 stream to see if there is any reason for us to hold off on
this.  Other considerations involve our users using Eclipse 3.1 (if
there are compatibility issues), and ATP integration, which is only
available in the 3.2 platform.

Thoughts?

As for your question Paul, we don't require 0.7 of the RDB anymore,
although to use the standard RDB 1.0 version and work with an Oracle 9
or 10 database, you have to fix bug 106841 <show_bug.cgi?id=106841> in
your DB definitions.  The required fix is in the bug comments.

Neil


Paul Fullbright wrote:

> Do we still need a special version of RDB, or can we simply use what's
> in 0.7 of the WTP?
> _______________________________________________
> dali-dev mailing list
> dali-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dali-dev

_______________________________________________
dali-dev mailing list
dali-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dali-dev

Back to the top