Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123


I have checked in the changes in CVS.  The COSMOS framework code has been refactored to use the new annoations in the ME subproject.  You will need to extract the two modules from ME to compile the lastest data collection code.  I will work with Jagmit to change the build accordingly.  

Regards,
_________________________
Hubert Leung
IBM Toronto Lab
hkyleung@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3382



"Hawkins, Joel" <Joel.Hawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/30/2008 10:55 AM

Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"Cosmos Dev" <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123





Code is checked in under 215123.

 

Joel

 

-----Original Message-----
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hubert H Leung
Sent:
Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:58 AM
To:
Cosmos Dev
Subject:
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 


Hi Bill,


I have migrated the data manager code to use the new annotations (cosmos.me*).  It's using a newer version of the annotation code than what's in CVS.  So Joel will need to check in his changes too.  I will check in the code after the architecture call, just to make sure we have a good integration build.  My checkins will cause the build to break.  I will open a bug for Jagmit to update the build.  


The migration to the new annotation code is not complete.  I have only tested the query API so far.  But I can check in the code now to support incremental check in approach.


Regards,
_________________________
Hubert Leung
IBM Toronto Lab
hkyleung@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3382

"Muldoon, William H" <William.Muldoon@xxxxxx>
Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/30/2008 09:30 AM


Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"Cosmos Dev" <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
 
Subject
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 


   




Joel

 
           I’m using the ExampleMDR, which is built using the IDataManager interface.

 
           I think the problem is that our Data Managers are still using the “old” annotations (in cosmos.dc.*) while the new policy provider capability requires the “new” annotations (in cosmos.me.*). So we need to convert to the new annotations and deprecate the old annotations, correct? If so, do you already have code “pending check-in” for this conversion?
 
Regards

Bill

 

 



From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hawkins, Joel
Sent:
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:25 PM
To:
Cosmos Dev
Subject:
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 

Bill,
 
Look at the test case for policy. You need to implement that policy provider interface on one of your capabilities. Is the cmdbf code checked in? I can take a look at your resource implementation to see what you’ve got.

 
Cheers,

Joel

 
-----Original Message-----
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muldoon, William H
Sent:
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:06 PM
To:
Cosmos Dev
Subject:
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 

Joel

 
           I’ve setup the ExampleMDR with the new metadata interface under OSGI. The client code is simply:

 
MetadataExchangeClient mex =
new MetadataExchangeClient(eprDataManager);
           Element result = mex.getWSDL();

                 

           WSDL is returned (see attachment) but it doesn’t include the metadata. I see this on the example mdr osgi console (so I reached the server side):

 
osgi> SOAP:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<wsx:GetMetadata xmlns:wsx="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/mex">

   <wsx:Dialect>http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/</wsx:Dialect>

</wsx:GetMetadata>

 
           But the new code in your patch is never reached. Any ideas why?

 
Regards

Bill

 

 



From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hawkins, Joel
Sent:
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:17 AM
To:
Cosmos Dev
Subject:
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 

Bill,

 
JAX-WS allows you to specify a wsdl location in the webservice annotation, and I’m guessing that this is used by the JAX-WS implementation to sew up the location in order to respond to a ?wsdl call, or whatever mechanism the JAX-WS implementation chooses to expose. I think our stance should be that the client retrieves the wsdl in a container-specific way, as the spec takes no stance on the matter.

 
The rest of the design looks good – now I need to check that I’m actually able to deliver the wsdl to Axis2! ;-)

 
Cheers,

Joel
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muldoon, William H
Sent:
Monday, January 28, 2008 5:35 PM
To:
Cosmos Dev
Subject:
RE: [cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 

Joel

 
           I’ve updated the design page at
http://wiki.eclipse.org/COSMOS_Design_215123. Please review that it matches your patch. I wasn’t sure about WSDL in JAX-WS so I left it as an open issue.
 
Thanks

Bill

 

 



From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hawkins, Joel
Sent:
Monday, January 28, 2008 8:12 AM
To:
Muldoon, William H
Cc:
Cosmos Dev
Subject:
[cosmos-dev] RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 

Hey Bill – sure, patch is attached:

 
You can look at the fixtures for the test case to see how to use it. If you’re happy with it, we’ll commit it as soon as i9 opens.

 
Cheers,

Joel

 
-----Original Message-----
From:
Muldoon, William H [mailto:William.Muldoon@xxxxxx]
Sent:
Friday, January 25, 2008 5:01 PM
To:
Hawkins, Joel
Subject:
RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 

Joel

 
           I think you’re right. Better wait until the i8 build is officially blessed.
 
           Meanwhile if it’s not too much trouble, can you send me a patch?

 
Thanks

Bill

 

 



From:
Hawkins, Joel [mailto:Joel.Hawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:
Friday, January 25, 2008 4:43 PM
To:
Muldoon, William H
Subject:
RE: CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 

Is it OK to check stuff in? I was holding out until i8 was out the door…

 

The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it
.

From:
Muldoon, William H [mailto:William.Muldoon@xxxxxx]
Sent:
Friday, January 25, 2008 4:08 PM
To:
Hawkins, Joel
Subject:
CMDBf service data in WSDL 215123

 

Hi Joel

        Have you made any progress with the IPolicyAssertion support in the Contribution Manager that was discussed for https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=215123?

        If not, I can make the changes (just point me in the right direction in the code).

Regards

Bill
_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev
_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev


Back to the top