Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration

> Not even once LSP4E and Clangd mature a bit and become more featureful?


I meant, at this moment, there's probably too many missing things compared to CDT for someone to choose the generic editor over CDT's so I think it will be more useful for people interested in Clangd itself. But yeah, if both LSP4E and Clangd mature then I can definitely see situations where users would prefer the Generic editor + Clangd. You can already get very accurate diagnostics with the right setup so it's promising.


Marc-André

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2017 8:16:47 PM
To: CDT Mailing List
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
 
> I don't expect anyone to use this except for tinkering with Clangd unless someone
> spends (much more) time on #4.

Not even once LSP4E and Clangd mature a bit and become more featureful?

Regards,
Nate
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

Back to the top