Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration

From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:16:47 +0000
Accept-language: en-CA, en-US
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AQHTCXi1474wSkmuXUOPkoOSByadRKJtCmbOgAAHGH4=
Thread-topic: Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration

> I don't expect anyone to use this except for tinkering with Clangd unless someone 
> spends (much more) time on #4.

Not even once LSP4E and Clangd mature a bit and become more featureful?

Regards,
Nate

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Marc-André Laperle

References:
- [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Nathan Ridge
- Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
  - From: Marc-André Laperle

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on LSP / Clangd integration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs