Re: [cdt-dev] Freemarker approved for CDT

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>]

That’s kind of what I meant by “we’ll leave it at that”. We can make this part of our CDT 9 plan. And by then, or before then, we can probably figure out how to make the two template engines co-habitate, if there’s demand for that.

For now, only the arduino.core plug-in will have the freemarker.jar in it. Eventually, I want to put it into Orbit, but we’re past the freeze for that too I think, or at the very least I won’t have time to figure out how to contribute to Orbit…

Doug.

From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 3:04 PM
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Freemarker approved for CDT

Does this mean introduction of new APIs? We are passed the freeze aren't we?

-sergey

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hey gang,

I have approval to use the Freemarker template engine with CDT. The Arduino plug-ins use that and I will be contributing those over the weekend in time for M7. I think for now, we’ll leave it at that, but going forward, I’d like to replace our template engine with it and to simplify some of how our New templates are managed.

I appreciate the work the Symbian guys did on the old one, but it’s time to move on, especially since it’s years now after they did…

Doug.

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev