Re: [cdt-dev] Mutlicore debug conf call minutes

[Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm all for attracting more people and I agree that we talk about CDT Debug beyond

the Multicore aspect.  But "Multicore" wording does have an appeal I think.

 

Since this meeting is only advertised on this list, maybe it is sufficient to

let people know in each invite that we will be discussing "anything Debug"?

 

---

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mikhail Khodjaiants
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:17 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Mutlicore debug conf call minutes

On 12/02/2013 1:48 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:

An interesting thing I noticed is that a lot of these topics aren't specific to multi-core. I wonder if we should change the name of the call to be more generic to attract more participants. 

I think it should be called "CDT Debug" but "multi-core" probably attracts more people.